RegisterHome 
     
ABOUT SRS
 
USERNAME:
PASSWORD:
Remember Me?
ENTER
Forgot Your Password?
Register an account.

SRS Bulletin - Current Issue
VISION 20/20 FINAL REPORT
 
Charge

Background

Introduction

Part I.
Internal Governance
   A. Executive Committee/Board of Directors
   B. Nomination/Election Process
   C. Other Bylaws Amemdments Regarding
   Society Governance
   D. Membership Classes
   E. Sections
   F. Section Heads
   G. Revision to Mission Statement
   H. Comittee/Task Force Struction
   I. Administrative Support and Continuity

Part II. Intersocietal Relationships

Part III. Member Services

Part IV. Training and Job Development




Charge to the Vision2020 Task Force
  • to assess present and future needs of the SRS in the areas of: 1) internal governance and organization, 2) inter societal relationships, 3) member services and 4) training and job development.
  • to develop programs and projects that will address the identified SRS needs.
  • to develop a schedule for implementation of the various programs and projects.
top



Background

The Vision2020 Task Force of the Sleep Research Society was appointed by SRS in January of 1998 and includes the following members: Mary A. Carskadon, Ph.D. (Chair), Ruth M. Benca, M.D., Ph.D., David F. Dinges, Ph.D., Dale M. Edgar, Ph.D., Ralph Lydic, Ph.D., Gina Poe, Ph.D., and Timothy A. Roehrs, Ph.D. The charge of the task force included a final report to the Executive Committee of the SRS at the end of 1998. The task force was organized into 4 subcommittees for preliminary deliberations: Internal Governance and Organization (David Dinges and Timothy Roehrs); Intersocietal Relationships (Ruth Benca and Ralph Lydic); Member Services (Gina Poe and Mary Carskadon); Training and Job Development (Dale Edgar and Mary Carskadon). Initial discussions highlighted the need for a survey of the membership to clarify the make up of our society and to obtain information regarding the perceptions, needs, and wishes of SRS members. A survey was developed and circulated to SRS members in early May, 1998, with a www version placed on the SRS home page as a courtesy from WebSciences. The task force extends its thanks to WebSciences (especially Kellee Hays) for this service, which greatly enhanced member participation in the survey. Thanks are also due to Carol Leotta and Bonnie Boyd, trainees in Dr. Carskadon’s lab who set up the survey data file, entered the data, and performed the analyses. Finally, the task force thanks Karin Anding for assistance in setting up and coordinating conference calls.

Vision2020 Task Force deliberations proceeded through a series of conference calls. A preliminary report was prepared and distributed to the SRS Executive Committee at the annual scientific meeting in June, 1998. This preliminary report included an overview of initial deliberations and a range of potential recommendations, along with a full report of the survey results.

This final report includes the final recommendations of the Vision2020 Task Force to the Executive Committee of the Sleep Research Society, respectfully submitted 31 December 1998.

top

Introduction: Summary of the SRS Membership Survey Results

The membership survey was informative to the deliberations of the task force in several respects. The survey was completed by 182 members, representing approximately one fourth of the registered membership of the society. Three quarters of the respondents were from the US, 73% ages 30 to 59, and 56% male. Of those with advanced degrees, about two thirds were PhDs, one fifth MDs, and one sixth MD/PhDs. A majority (60%) were located in a medical school environment, with the largest minority (15.4%) in colleges of arts and sciences. An interesting contrast to this distribution is the finding that two-thirds of the trainees hoped to seek permanent positions in university or college settings, 11% in medical schools, and 5% in industrial or governmental positions. Current research funding was reported by 64% of the respondents. About one quarter of the respondents reported their major research area as basic sciences (animal research or cellular/molecular), nearly 45% performed research principally with healthy humans in the lab or the field, and for about 16% the principal area of research was sleep disorders.

For 75% of respondents, the APSS meeting was ranked among the top three of importance to them (first = 48%, second = 21%, third =6%). One tenth rated the Society for Neurosciences as their most important meeting. The top three meetings ranked as most important to the responding members were all sleep meetings (APSS, WFSRS, ESRS), followed by the Society for Neurosciences meeting. Overwhelmingly, the two most important aspects of SRS membership for the full members responding were professional identity (57.6%) and the journal Sleep (34.8%). Trainees reported professional identity (37.2%) and trainee support for APSS (23.3%) the most important aspects of membership in SRS.

In terms of new SRS member services, the most frequently endorsed of the top three choices by both full and trainee members was enhanced WWW services (56.9% full, 58.1% trainee). Reduced fees for other societies (44.7%), discount price for Sleep Research annual volume (33.3%), discount for other publications (21.2%), grants advisory panel (21.2%), discount for Sleep Research Online annual hardcover edition (18.1%), and extra-societal symposium support (15.9%) received progressively fewer endorsements (percentages for full members).

The free-comment fields in the survey resulted in many suggestions, thoughtful appraisals of the role of SRS, and a range of ideas and strategies for the future of SRS. A crude summary of these diverse comments finds general support for societal democratization and improved communication, training and professional development, enhanced internet services, increased attention to clinical research, and greater participation of SRS in the general realm of public and governmental affairs, particularly vis-à-vis increased public awareness and increased sleep research initiatives and funding, as might be influenced, for example, by NIH and the National Center for Sleep Disorders Research.

These data and comments served as a background to and provided guidance for the task force deliberations. The recommendations of the task force are described below for the four areas of Societal business for which the task force was charged: internal governance, intersocietal relations, member services, and training and job development. Bold text highlights specific recommendations.

top

Part I. Internal Governance

The task force considered many options regarding governance of the SRS. Because numerous areas of the SRS Bylaws no longer reflect the present nature of the society and in response to changes recommended by the task force, a general overview and revision of the SRS Bylaws is recommended. Specific changes and wording are recommended for several Articles (see below), which the task force hopes will be used to guide bylaws modifications. In addition, a careful and comprehensive review of the SRS Bylaws is also recommended. In order to carry out this review and to make revisions in a timely fashion, the Vision2020 Task Force recommends speedy appointment by the SRS Executive Committee of a "Bylaws Revision Task Force" with appropriate budgetary support to carry out the directions of the SRS Executive Committee and Board of Directors in revising the SRS Bylaws with suitable legal consultation.

top

A. Executive Committee/Board of Directors
The task force recommends that the Bylaws of the SRS be modified to define the Board of Directors and the Executive Committee in ways that reflect the functions of the SRS elected officers more appropriately. At present (Article 8.1, 8.2), the Executive Committee is defined as the "members of the Board of Directors, the Membership Chairperson, the Publications Person, the Chairperson for Trainees, four (4) Members at Large, and ex-officio and non-voting members, the principal editors of Sleep and Sleep Research. The Board of Directors shall be composed of the President, the President Elect, the Past President, and the Executive Secretary/Treasurer." The task force recommends that the wording of the Bylaws be modified to reverse this nomenclature. Hence, the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors will become the President, President Elect, Past President, and Executive Secretary/Treasurer, and the Board of Directors is the full panel of elected officers and ex-officio members (see below for recommended changes to Article 9.6.4 regarding members of the Executive Committee/ Board of Directors).

The task force recommendation begins with the following modification to Article 8.2 of the Bylaws.

CURRENT: "8.2 Number, Tenure, and Qualifications. The number of members of the Executive Committee shall be at least eleven (11), of which four (4) members shall serve as the Board of Directors. Each member of the Executive Committee and Board of Directors shall hold office until his/her successor has been elected and qualifies. The Executive Committee shall consist of at least four (4) members of the Board of Directors, the Membership Chairperson, the Publications Person, the Chairperson for Trainees, four (4) Members at Large, and ex-officio and non-voting members, the Principal Editors of Sleep and Sleep Research."

RECOMMENDED: "8.2 Number, Tenure, and Qualifications. The number of members of the Board of Directors shall be at least eleven (11), of which four (4) members shall serve as the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors. Each member of the Board of Directors and Executive Committee shall hold office until his/her successor has been elected and qualifies. The Board of Directors shall consist of at least four (4) members of the Executive Committee, the Membership Chairperson, the Publications Chairperson, the Chairperson for Trainee Programs, no more than five (5) nor fewer than three (3) Heads of Sections, and ex-officio and non-voting members, the principal Editor of Sleep and the Chairperson of the APSS Program Committee."

The nomenclature change ramifies throughout the Bylaws; however, the task force recommends a careful review rather than a simple substitution of one phrase for the other. In several instances, the Executive Committee/Board of Directors may wish to have broader input in decision-making rather than to narrow it. For example, Articles 7.1.1 and 7.5 indicate that the dues structure is adjusted by the Board of Directors; the task force recommends that this function be a task of the entire panel of officers (provided this meets legal requirements). Other instances where search and substitute might be the wrong approach need to be carefully evaluated.

top

B. Nominations/Election Process
In order to reflect and direct current operations, the task force recommends the following changes to the nominations and election process.

1. Modify Article 9.1 of the Bylaws in the following way.

CURRENT: "9.1 General. The officers of the Corporation shall be the President, the President-Elect, the Past President, the Executive Secretary/Treasurer, the Program Chairperson, the Membership Chairperson, the Publications Chairperson, the Principal Editor(s) of Sleep Research (ex-officio) and Sleep (ex-officio) and such other officers as may be elected or appointed in accordance with the provisions of this Article."

RECOMMENDED: "9.1 General. The officers of the Corporation shall be the President, the President-Elect, the Past President, the Executive Secretary/Treasurer, the Membership Chairperson, the Publications Chairperson, the Chairperson for Trainee Programs, and the Heads of Sections."

2. Modify Article 9.2 of the Bylaws in the following way.

CURRENT: "The Board of Directors shall serve as the nominating committee. They shall solicit nomination, by mail from the membership, and shall recommend a full slate of candidates for each elective office. The nominations of the Executive Committee shall b e [sic] submitted to the membership for vote by mail ballot."

RECOMMENDED: "The Heads of Sections shall serve as the nominating committee. They shall solicit nominations, by mail from the membership, and shall recommend two candidates for each elective office. The candidates shall represent the breadth of membership and provide for balanced representation of the members. Members of the nominating committee are not eligible for nomination to elective office. Members of the Board of Directors [see new definitions proposed in Part 1, Section A above] whose terms of office will not expire by the time elected officers assume office are not eligible for nomination. Whenever possible, SRS historical precedent should be maintained: to wit, persons who have previously served in an office are not eligible for nomination to that office. The nominated slates shall be submitted to the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors [new] for review and to the full Board of Directors [new] for final approval. The approved nominations shall be submitted to the membership for vote by mail ballot and/or secure electronic ballot."

top

C. Other Bylaws Amendments Regarding Society Governance

Other sections of the Bylaws contain egregious internal inconsistencies regarding SRS governance. For example, the Bylaws do not describe the duties of the President-Elect and Past-President, nor is the table of organization (vis-à-vis presiding member of the executive officers in the event of the absence of the President) clearly articulated. Articles 9.6.2 and 9.6.3 inappropriately describe an Executive Secretary and Treasurer, two executive offices that were in part combined when the society opted for the triple-president structure and in part devolved to the presidents past and elect. The task force recommends that bylaws Article 9.6 be revised to describe the duties of the executive officers as presently constituted.

In addition, the task force recommends the following description of the duties of the Chairperson for Trainee Programs be added to the Bylaws as Article 9.6.7.

RECOMMENDED: "9.6.7. The Chairperson for Trainee Programs shall have primary responsibility for developing and implementing programs for sleep research trainees in accordance with the mission of the Sleep Research Society. These programs include trainee events and activities held at the annual scientific meeting, SRS sponsorship of an annual Trainee Workshop (application solicitation and evaluation), SRS annual High School Essay Contest, and other training activities formally endorsed and approved by the Board of Directors. The Chairperson for Trainee Programs may establish subcommittees of SRS trainees or full or associate members (according to guidelines governing task force establishment) to facilitate the development and implementation of SRS-sponsored trainee events and activities. The Chairperson for Trainee Programs chairs the Training and Education Advisory Committee (TEAC) and presents the committee’s recommendations to the Board of Directors. The Chairperson for Trainee Programs is also responsible for implementation of the SRS sponsored Trainee Travel Awards Program, including awards given for scientific merit to assist trainee travel to the annual scientific meeting, SRS sponsored workshops, or other meeting for which trainee travel assistance has been endorsed and approved by the Board of Directors. The policies and procedures for issuing such awards to trainees are recommended by TEAC and approved by the SRS Board of Directors. The Chairperson for Trainee Programs is responsible for developing and submitting an annual budget to the Board of Directors for their approval, presenting an annual report of activities to the Board of Directors and the annual business meeting of the Society, and to perform other duties as designated by the Board of Directors or President of the Society from time to time."

top

D. Membership Classes

In order to include in the Sleep Research Society an important group of individuals with a significant role in sleep research, the task force recommends that a new member class be defined and welcomed into the Society. To accomplish this goal, the task force recommends the following modification (Article 7.1) and addition (7.1.5) to the Bylaws of the Corporation. Until bylaws revision can be accomplished, the task force recommends that this new member class be implemented on a trial basis as soon as possible.

1. Modify Article 7.1 of the Bylaws as follows.

CURRENT: "7.1 Classes of Members. The Corporation shall have four (4) classes of members: full members, emeritus members, student members, and corresponding members."

RECOMMENDED: "7.1 Classes of Members. The Corporation shall have five (5) classes of members: full members, emeritus members, student members, associate members, and corresponding members."

2. Add Article 7.1.5 to the Bylaws as follows.

RECOMMENDED: "7.1.5 Associate Members shall be persons actively engaged in sleep research, usually as a member in the laboratory of a full, emeritus, or corresponding member of the SRS, but who are not eligible for another membership class by virtue of not having an advanced academic degree or not fulfilling criteria for trainee status. Associate membership requires a letter from a member of the Corporation signifying active sleep research participation. Associate members are typically research assistants, research associates, technical research support staff, or other nondoctoral/nontrainee research staff. Dues shall be as for emeritus members. Associate members—as do emeritus members—may subscribe to publications at their pleasure, paying rates applicable to full members. Associate members receive informational publications available to full members, such as a sleep newsletter. As do all members, each associate member shall designate a primary and affiliate Section annually."

Most task force members considered that Associate Members should be accorded voting status in the Society after a number of years of membership; however, without a better sense of those who may apply for Associate membership, such a decision may be premature. In the event that voting privileges are accorded this membership class, the task force recommends the following wording for article 7.1.5 of the bylaws: "Associate members acquire voting privileges in the Society after five consecutive years of membership."

top

E. Sections

The task force recommends a new Article for the Bylaws describing the Sections. This will become Article 7.9 (and following).

RECOMMENDED: "7.9 Sections. Sections are established by the mechanisms outlined below in order to ensure broad representation of the SRS membership on the Board of Directors and on committees and task forces of the SRS. Sections were first established in 1995 after a vote of the membership to identify areas of research interest. The Sections currently (1998) include: Basic Sleep Research, Sleep and Behavior Research, Sleep and Circadian Rhythms Research, and Excessive Daytime Sleepiness Research. For purposes of governance, the Society shall have not fewer than three (3) nor greater than five (5) Sections.

7.9.1 Creation of New Sections. Creation of a new Section occurs with a petition to the Board of Directors signed by >10% of the membership of the society for whom the Section will be the principal voting home and with the approval of a majority vote of the membership provided at least 20% of the voting members cast ballots. Newly petitioned Sections shall be submitted to the membership for vote by mail ballot and/or secure electronic ballot. The Board of Directors may initiate a petition drive in the event that the need for a new Section is identified.

7.9.2 Elimination of Sections. Sections are considered no longer viable when voting membership in a Section falls below 10% of the full members of the Society or by a majority vote of the full members of the society provided at least 20% of the membership votes. The Board of Directors shall initiate this process when the section membership falls below the 10% threshold.

7.9.3 Section Membership. Members of the society from all membership classes shall be requested annually to designate a Section for primary (voting) membership and a Section for affiliate membership. Selection of a primary Section shall be a requirement for membership. Section membership confers voting privileges to full and emeritus members. Section members are encouraged to communicate with Heads of Sections to provide input to the Board of Directors regarding issues or activities of particular relevance to the Section. All members are encouraged to communicate with any of the members of the Board of Directors about any societal concerns."

top

F. Section Heads

The task force recommends that Sections be strengthened by providing additional guidance in the Bylaws regarding the nature of Sections, their creation and extinction, structure, function, and the responsibilities of Heads of Sections. Therefore the task force proposes that Article 9.6.6 of the Bylaws (currently describing Members at Large of the Executive Committee) be replaced by the following.

RECOMMENDED: "9.6.6 Heads of Sections. The Heads of Sections serve for 3 years with a maximum of two (2) Heads rotating off the Board of Directors in a given year. The Heads of Section have the primary responsibilities to (1) represent the interests of the members of their Sections to the Board of Directors; (2) serve as the nominating committee of the SRS; (3) serve as SRS representative to the program committee of the APSS annual scientific meeting; (4) perform other activities as may be directed by the Board of Directors from time to time. Heads of Section unable to attend regular meetings of the APSS Program Committee and otherwise to serve on this body may be replaced by the Board of Directors at the request of the Chairperson of the Program Committee. The Heads of Sections shall foster sleep research and its communication by encouraging Section members to propose symposia, speakers, workshops, courses, discussion group, and other presentations at the annual scientific meeting. A chairperson of the Heads of Sections shall be appointed each year by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors to facilitate coordination of the joint activities of the Heads of Section. Heads of Sections may propose to the Board of Directors initiatives in the areas of training, education, or communication that focus on the interests of the Section membership. To help ensure broad representation and access to service, Heads of Sections shall provide names of Section members interested in serving on committees or task forces of the SRS to the Board of Directors or Chairpersons of the committees or task forces, as appropriate."

top

G. Revision to Mission Statement

The task force recommends that the mission of the SRS as stated in the Bylaws be slightly revised in the following manner.

CURRENT: "2.1.3 To promote education and training in sleep research."

RECOMMENDED: "2.1.3 To foster education and training on all aspects of sleep research."

top

H. Committee/Task Force Structure

In response to a diversity of indicators that SRS members wish to have increased opportunities to be involved in society affairs and to broaden the leadership structure of the Society, the task force recommends that the revised Bylaws provide clarification and direction for committee and task force creation and dissolution. The revised Bylaws should prescribe standing committees not only for the purpose of carrying out the business of the Society, but also as a means of opening the Society’s governance to a wider number of members, to provide intermediate and junior level members experience and training in society leadership and governance, and to ensure that the interests of all members are well represented. The task force recommends that currently constituted committees and task forces be reviewed to determine whether they meet the guidelines set forth below, which are intended to assist in revising the committee/task force Bylaws. [Note: terminology below uses the new definitions; thus, Board of Directors is the full 11-plus member Board.]

  1. Standing Committees should have:
    • a well-defined charge recorded in the minutes of the Board of Directors and communicated to the committee chair and members
    • reporting responsibility to the Board of Directors through a specified Board member who may or may not serve as the committee chair
    • member terms of 3 years duration with annual rotation of no more than 50% of members
    • members appointed by the Board of Directors
    • appointments made from a pool of volunteers, suggestions from Heads of Sections, or recruited from the membership at large in the event of no volunteers or suggestions
    • committee membership should reflect the diversity of the SRS in terms of sex, geographic region, racial/ethnic status, and Section membership, including trainee representation when appropriate
    • chairpersons appointed by the Board of Directors
    • chairpersons and members serving for single terms
    • provision for replacing committee members in the event of inability to serve
    • provision for decommissioning by Board of Directors if the charge is no longer viable or in the best interests of the SRS

  2. New Standing Committees are:
    • created by the Board of Directors as needs arise
    • formed following the guidelines outlined above
  3. Current Standing Committees prescribed by Bylaws or recently created include:
    • Membership Committee prescribed in current Bylaws
    • Training and Education Advisory Committee created 1997
    • Awards Committee created in 1998
    • Web Services Committee created in 1998

  4. Task Forces:
    • are created by the Board of Directors when a short-range need is identified
    • are provided a well-defined charge recorded in the minutes of the Board of Directors, communicated to the committee chair and members, and including a target date for the task force to achieve its aims and provide a final report to the Board of Directors
    • report to the Board of Directors through a specified Board member who may or may not serve as the task force chair
    • have members appointed by the Board of Directors from a pool of volunteers, suggestions from Heads of Sections, or recruited from the membership at large in the event of no volunteers or suggestions
    • task force membership should reflect the diversity of the SRS in terms of sex, geographic region, racial/ethnic status, and Section membership, including trainee representation when appropriate
    • provision for replacing task force members in the event of inability to serve
    • have a chairperson appointed by the Board of Directors
    • may be decommissioned by Board of Directors if the charge is no longer viable or in the best interests of the SRS

  5. Current task forces include:
    • Vision2020 Task Force created in 1998 for termination in December, 1998
    • Finances Task Force created in 1998 for termination in October, 1999

top

I. Administrative Support and Continuity

In the course of making recommendations regarding structural changes to SRS internal governance, particularly enhanced committee/task force involvement in Societal affairs, and in recognition of projected enhancements to other aspects of SRS function, the Vision2020 Task Force has identified administrative support and continuity as a significant weakness of the current SRS structure. Improved administrative services will enhance the Society’s ability to maintain its identity; establish a broader basis of function and membership involvement; provide appropriate levels of support for the Board of Directors, Executive Committee, standing committees, and task forces; maintain a continuity of membership services; and provide an optimized platform for launching the SRS into the 21st century. Adequate administrative support will also alleviate some of the burden traditionally assumed by members serving in volunteer or elective roles who have used their local resources to support the Society’s business.

Fulfillment of this need may require hiring a Director and support staff or may be achieved through renegotiation of services with the current service providers at the ASDA administrative office. A combination of approaches may also be feasible.

The task force recommends that the SRS take prompt steps to establish an administrative support structure that will meet the following needs within the budgetary strictures of the SRS:

  1. Administrative support that puts SRS and its interests paramount.
  2. A proactive resource to
    A. ensure that the society meets deadlines
    B. appraise (reminding) executive officers of issues that need follow-up input
    C. coordinate mailings of the society
    D. generate and implement ideas for such things as membership recruitment, publicity, areas where SRS influence might be important
    E. provide administrative support for Section Heads, assisting in the coordination and execution of Section functions
    F. monitor and identify opportunities for the society to advance its mission and provide optimal member services
    G. maintain records and administrative archives of the Society’s business

  3. Reactive to ongoing SRS needs

    A. Committee meetings
    (1) administrative support for scheduling meetings and teleconferences, preparing minutes, reminders to chairs, follow-up
    (2) facilitate communication of committees to Board of Directors

    B. Administrative support for newsletter

    (1) assist editor
    (2) solicit advertising

    C. Administrative support for secretary/treasurer
    (1) minutes of Board meetings
    (2) archive records of Society business
    (3) assist with budget preparation
    (4) expedite activities of the SRS Board of Directors and secretary/treasurer vis-à-vis contract negotiations, payments, etc.

    D. Administrative support for Chairperson for Trainees and TEAC
    (1) assist in solicitation and processing of applications for SRS Trainee Travel Awards
    (2) assist in preparation and distribution of Award letters and awards
    (3) otherwise provide administrative assistance to facilitate the efforts of this executive officer and standing committee
    E. Executive "brain" and continuity, responsive to executive officers and committee chairs to carry out the business of the Society. SRS will particularly need administrative assistance in the short-term with revisions to Bylaws.
    top

    Part II. Intersocietal Relationships

    The Vision2020 Task Force recognizes that the Sleep Research Society is an important, viable scientific society serving valuable roles in the areas of sleep research and training. The SRS has a strong heritage and a promising future. A strong alliance with the American Sleep Disorders Association (ASDA) has been a critical factor enabling the SRS to begin expanding the scope of its activities and to permit serious consideration of future enhancements to societal function. The Vision2020 Task Force, therefore, strongly recommends that the SRS/ASDA alliance be maintained, and that merger not be considered for the foreseeable future. Whereas partnership is important and has been quite successful with such activities as the journal Sleep and the annual scientific meeting, the task force recommends that the separate identities, goals, visions, and governance of the two societies be maintained.

    The task force recommends that mutually beneficial initiatives in areas that support all aspects of sleep research and sleep research training are to be encouraged and fostered not only with the ASDA but also with other scientific societies or federations, charitable organizations, or other entities with whom such worthwhile initiatives can be identified and established. Therefore, the task force recommends to Board that active efforts be made to establish a dialogue with societies having related scientific interests with the goal of identifying opportunities for research or collaboration, new research paradigms, and so forth. In addition, the task force recommends that the Past President of the SRS be given an active role in maintaining direct contact with the leadership of related scientific societies (e.g., European Sleep Research Society, World Federation of Sleep Research Societies, Society for Research on Biological Rhythms, and Society for Neuroscience) to explore potential for these scientific goals, as well as mutually beneficial initiatives, such as mutual reductions of membership fees, journal subscriptions, and so forth.

    The task force has identified a major area of weakness in SRS structure and function having to do with governmental and public affairs. One member of the task force currently serves on the Public Affairs Committee of the American Physiological Society and has suggested that body as a model for the SRS to use in forming a new SRS standing committee on public affairs. The role of this committee will be to assist the executive officers and Board of Directors in identifying opportunities, concerns, and initiatives in the public sector that may affect the SRS mission or members and to identify appropriate responses of the SRS to such public-sector issues. The Vision2020 Task Force identifies a concern that the Society have in place processes to provide Board oversight for public statements or recommendations that may emanate from such a committee. The task force notes that such a committee requires administrative support and that the SRS is likely to benefit from enlisting shared resources of the ASDA governmental affairs committee and by maintaining open communications with the National Sleep Foundation and patient advocacy groups, which provide other access points to public affairs issues. The task force recommends that the Board of Directors of the SRS take prompt action to establish a standing committee on Public Affairs. A major item in the charge of this committee is to enhance the profile of the SRS vis-à-vis the National Center for Sleep Disorders Research.

    top

    Part III. Member Services

    The chief member service need identified by the Vision2020 Task Force is enhanced WWW services. As noted in the introduction, he most frequently endorsed of the top three choices by both full and trainee members was enhanced WWW services (56.9% full, 58.1% trainee). In response to the survey results, the SRS executive committee has already established a standing committee on Web Services to begin filling this need. The task force identified a number of possible enhancements to the SRS web services, such as improved SRS web site visibility, resource for course syllabus preparation (e.g., course syllabus bank), enhanced NAPS reference downloading capability, individual member web page profiles, updated Basics of Sleep Behavior, notification of meetings and meeting deadlines, relevant grant funding RFA/RFP notification, societal archives, posting of executive committee meeting minutes, membership directory. This is neither an exhaustive nor inclusive list of suggestions; however, the clear sense of the task force is that the members are interested in the society’s assistance in exploiting the internet to serve their needs.

    Other member services will likely enhance the value of SRS membership and attract more sleep researchers to the society. To coordinate development of such services, the task force recommends that the job description of the Membership Chair be extended to include identification of new member services for the Board of Directors to consider. To enhance input to this process, the task force further recommends that the Membership Committee (as described in the current Bylaws) be more formally implemented and committee members appointed (according to guidelines suggested under Part I, Section H above). To begin such a committee’s deliberation, below are listed a number of member services identified by the survey and in parentheses the percentage of full and trainee members rating these services among their top three choices:

    ¥ membership fee reduction to related societies (44.7%, 45.1%)
    ¥ discounted rate for hard-copy volume of Sleep Research Online (18.1%, 20.9%)
    ¥ discounted rate for Sleep Research (33.3%, 24.5%)
    ¥ discounted rate for publications of related societies (21.2%, 30.2%)
    ¥ grants advisory panel (to assist with routing grant proposals to appropriate review; to recommend reviewers for review committees; to provide advice to applicant) (21.2%, 33.5%)
    ¥ sleep research symposia or presentations at meetings of other societies (15.9%, 13.9%)
    ¥ sleep research speakers bureau (9%. 2.3%)

    top

    Part IV. Training and Job Development

    In the decade of the 1990’s the SRS made a firm commitment to foster the future of sleep research by increasing its support for sleep research training. Initial efforts principally involved support for trainee attendance to the annual scientific meeting of the Society and support for the annual training event of the NIH-funded basic sleep research training program at UCLA. More recent initiatives have strengthened the Trainee Travel Award program, increased the number and scope of Trainee activities (e.g., annual high school essay contest) and services (e.g., training opportunities manual, trainee day at annual scientific meeting), and established a mechanism for members to apply for funds to support other training activities. These activities have been been fruitful, yet other needs are apparent. In particular, as we succeed in training new generations of sleep researchers, a need for jobs becomes acute. The following recommendations are intended to provide for ongoing and enhanced trainee functions and to begin a process of job opportunity enhancement in sleep research.

    A. Training and Education Endowment Fund

    For the past 10 years, SRS trainee activities and programs have been supported from the operating budget of the Society. While the flow of funds has been adequate to support ongoing programs, budgetary uncertainties have on occasion affected the smooth continuity of and planning for trainee functions. To stabilize trainee operations and remove these expenses from the Society’s operating budget, the task force recommends establishment of a Training and Education Endowment Fund, with a target amount of $1.7 million, which with a very conservative 5% earnings return will provide adequate funding to sustain trainee operations into the foreseeable future. Until the target endowment is achieved, the SRS general operating funds will be required to support ongoing trainee programs. As soon as possible, however, trainee program should be fully supported by the endowment earnings. Spending authorization requires approval of the Executive Committee and Board of Directors. Signature authority on the Training and Education Account shall vest with the Secretary/Treasurer and the President of the Sleep Research Society. Appropriate legal counsel will be required to establish guidelines for the endowment.

    The task force recommends that development of the endowment fund proceed with the following two initiatives. First, start-up of the endowment can be accomplished by earmarking a portion of the current SRS general fund (not to exceed 50%) as endowment principle. Second, a Task Force for Endowment Development shall be established to plan and implement national and international fund raising efforts whose goal is to produce a rapid increase the endowment principle from outside sources.

    B. Job Development Initiatives

    The success of training efforts is marked by the number of scientists trained in sleep research who are currently or soon to be on the job market. Due to the limited number of research positions specifically designated for sleep research, the success of our trainees will be enhanced by expanded job development initiatives by the SRS. The task force has identified a number of areas in which SRS might take steps to enhance such job opportunities. The suggestions below span a range of levels of investment and commitment on the part of SRS, and the task force recommends that these suggestions be considered in the Society’s short-term and long-term planning as appropriate. The suggestions below are formulated largely in the context of academic environments, but most may be adjusted for use as well in industrial or governmental research settings. A major thrust of the suggestions is to create impactful statements that highlight the state of sleep science, the enhanced opportunities for research that accrue when sleep research is added to a research portfolio, and the gaps that exist in pursuing such opportunities. The following suggestions illustrate a few ideas the task force felt may have merit for the Society to pursue in the areas of job development.

    1. Create and distribute promotional-informational pamphlets or brochures to give identity to sleep research, highlighting cutting-edge research techniques, approaches, tools, and findings, as well as their implications and important gaps. Such material might perhaps identify or highlight individual sleep researchers and the departments in which their appointments reside. [Thus, for example, Dr. X whose research laboratory is in the department of (biology or psychology or physiology or endocrinology or psychiatry or neurology or pulmonary medicine and so forth) recently published the following sleep-related finding in some high profile venue or other and also provides the following important service or function within the department.] Such promotional information might also reside on the society’s web site.

    2. Create an annual "speakership" for our most articulate, charismatic, cutting-edge sleep researcher(s) to provide colloquium/seminar presentations to relevant departments in colleges and universities and medical schools (or industrial/governmental venues) that do not have any sleep research or sleep educational activities. Provide SRS resources to fund or supplement travel and honoraria, to publicize the events, and to provide administrative support. Provide materials to the speaker(s) to facilitate using the opportunity to highlight the roles that a sleep researcher can play in the local setting. The speaker(s) might also serve to network information about job opportunities and candidate job applicants with training in sleep research.

    3. The SRS might also consider encouraging, facilitating, sponsoring, or organizing an effort to produce a state-of-the-art text book to complement or supplement courses with a focus on sleep and sleep research. The SRS should promote timely revisions to maintain currency of such a volume. The availability of such a high-quality resource may enhance the potential for our job-seeking trainees to highlight teaching in creating their job-search portfolios.

    4. A more long-range initiative might involve an SRS "matching funds" pool for academic slots at colleges, universities, and medical schools. Such an endeavor requires significant commitment of resources to accomplish and is beyond the current means of the SRS. Nevertheless, creative initiatives or partnerships might make such a plan feasible. In such an initiative, the SRS might offer matching funds toward the salary of a first-time junior faculty member (Assistant Professor). Departments or deans would apply for matching funds from the SRS. The SRS funding would be limited (e.g., 1 or 2 years) with the intent of aiding the junior faculty member until she/he can obtain sufficient external funding (the latter is the obligation of the junior faculty recipient). In exchange for the SRS support, the Department receiving the matching funds makes a firm commitment to the junior faculty member for at least 3 years with an intention to continue supporting the slot as a regular faculty position according to the institution’s procedures.

 

Spring 2010 Issue of the SRS Bulletin is Now Available
Important Dates & Times Related to the Move of the SRS National Office in June
SRS Basics of Sleep Guide, second edition
Special Discount Available for Bulk Orders of the Single Slide Sets Series!
more announcements...

 SRS Membership Application
 SRS Membership Brochure
 SRS Basics of Sleep Guide
 
If you can not view our
PDF files download
Acrobat Reader from Adobe.